The forum, held at Newport City Hall, only allowed wind farm proponents to share their glowing reviews of the project’s benefits, while opponents were notably barred from presenting their concerns. This blatant suppression of free speech has left many Newport residents questioning the motives of both the Energy and Environment Commission and the City Council.
The Energy and Environment Commission, established by the Newport City Council and composed of its appointees, appears to have a clear agenda: to push through the wind farm project without considering the potential drawbacks or listening to dissenting voices.
Councilman Carlin’s resolution sought to remedy this by requesting that the commission host another public meeting, this time allowing wind farm opponents to present their views. Should the commission refuse, the resolution proposed that the city administration step in to ensure a fair and open discussion. However, in a move that many are calling an endorsement of censorship, the council voted against Carlin’s proposal, effectively stifling any further debate on the matter.
Critics argue that the Newport City Council is more interested in protecting its own interests and the wind farm project than fostering an open dialogue. By shutting down Carlin’s resolution, the council has not only disregarded the voices of concerned citizens but has also demonstrated a disturbing willingness to suppress free speech and healthy debate.
The council’s decision has left Newport residents wondering: what are they trying to hide, and why are they so afraid of a fair discussion? For now, it seems the Newport City Council is more concerned with maintaining control than with transparency and fairness.
Like Newport Buzz? We depend on the generosity of readers like you who support us, to help with our mission to keep you informed and entertained with local, independent news and content. We truly appreciate your trust and support!
